PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYNB vs. CRDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYNB vs. CRDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNB achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than CRDT's 3.61% return.


DYNB

1D
0.18%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRDT

1D
1.01%
1M
2.46%
YTD
3.61%
6M
4.78%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNB vs. CRDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DYNB
Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF
0.40%0.54%
CRDT
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
3.61%-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNB and CRDT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYNB vs. CRDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNB

CRDT
CRDT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CRDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNB vs. CRDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DYNB vs. CRDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DYNBCRDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.64

-0.17

Drawdowns

DYNB vs. CRDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNB drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum CRDT drawdown of -9.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNB and CRDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYNBCRDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-9.80%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.67%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-2.31%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

Volatility

DYNB vs. CRDT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYNBCRDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87%

8.83%

-5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.87%

7.07%

-4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.87%

7.07%

-4.20%

DYNB vs. CRDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDT's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DYNB vs. CRDT - Dividend Comparison

DYNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than CRDT's 6.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CRDT
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
6.23%7.04%7.29%2.59%
DYNB
Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF
2.64%1.03%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYNB and CRDT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRDT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRDT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DYNB.

CRDT has the higher dividend yield at 6.23%, compared with 2.64% for DYNB.

They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DYNB and 0.50% for CRDT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYNB and CRDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer