DYNB vs. CRDT
DYNB (Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF) and CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYNB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CRDT.
Performance
DYNB vs. CRDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNB achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than CRDT's 3.61% return.
DYNB
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDT
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNB vs. CRDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% |
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 3.61% | -0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNB and CRDT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNB vs. CRDT — Risk / Return Rank
DYNB
CRDT
DYNB vs. CRDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYNB | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.64 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
DYNB vs. CRDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNB drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum CRDT drawdown of -9.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNB and CRDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNB | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -9.80% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -1.67% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -2.31% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.40% | — |
Volatility
DYNB vs. CRDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNB | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 8.83% | -5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 7.07% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 7.07% | -4.20% |
DYNB vs. CRDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNB vs. CRDT - Dividend Comparison
DYNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than CRDT's 6.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 6.23% | 7.04% | 7.29% | 2.59% |
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 2.64% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNB and CRDT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRDT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRDT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DYNB.
CRDT has the higher dividend yield at 6.23%, compared with 2.64% for DYNB.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DYNB and 0.50% for CRDT.
Find the right allocation for DYNB and CRDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer