PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRDT vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CRDT and CLOZ is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

CRDT vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.03%
6.28%
CRDT
CLOZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRDT:

1.29

CLOZ:

6.82

Sortino Ratio

CRDT:

1.90

CLOZ:

9.57

Omega Ratio

CRDT:

1.24

CLOZ:

3.63

Calmar Ratio

CRDT:

2.49

CLOZ:

8.47

Martin Ratio

CRDT:

6.17

CLOZ:

54.12

Ulcer Index

CRDT:

1.15%

CLOZ:

0.22%

Daily Std Dev

CRDT:

5.52%

CLOZ:

1.72%

Max Drawdown

CRDT:

-2.85%

CLOZ:

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

CRDT:

0.00%

CLOZ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDT achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's 1.04% return.


CRDT

YTD

1.78%

1M

1.78%

6M

4.02%

1Y

6.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLOZ

YTD

1.04%

1M

1.04%

6M

6.28%

1Y

11.65%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRDT vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRDT and CLOZ have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


CRDT
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for CRDT: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for CLOZ: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRDT vs. CLOZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRDT is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRDT is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRDT is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRDT is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRDT is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRDT is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOZ is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRDT vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRDT, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.296.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRDT, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.909.57
The chart of Omega ratio for CRDT, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.243.63
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRDT, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.498.47
The chart of Martin ratio for CRDT, currently valued at 6.17, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.1754.12
CRDT
CLOZ

The current CRDT Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 6.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDT and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.007.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.29
6.82
CRDT
CLOZ

Dividends

CRDT vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

CRDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, less than CLOZ's 9.00% yield.


TTM20242023
CRDT
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
7.16%7.29%2.58%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
9.00%9.09%8.81%

Drawdowns

CRDT vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDT drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDT and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember202500
CRDT
CLOZ

Volatility

CRDT vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.21%. This indicates that CRDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.78%
0.21%
CRDT
CLOZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab