CRDT vs. CDX
CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) and CDX (Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRDT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while CDX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRDT returned 4.09% vs -1.71% for CDX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRDT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for CDX.
Performance
CRDT vs. CDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDT achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -2.25% return.
CRDT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- -1.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDT vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 4.13% | -0.67% | 5.19% | 5.16% |
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | -2.25% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 8.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDT and CDX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.24 |
CRDT vs. CDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CRDT
CDX
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
CRDT
CDX
Consumer Cyclical
CRDT
CDX
Financial Services
CRDT
CDX
Basic Materials
CRDT
-
CDX
Communication Services
CRDT
-
CDX
Consumer Defensive
CRDT
-
CDX
Energy
CRDT
-
CDX
Healthcare
CRDT
-
CDX
Industrials
CRDT
-
CDX
Technology
CRDT
-
CDX
Utilities
CRDT
-
CDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDT vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank
CRDT
CDX
CRDT vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRDT | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | -0.30 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | -0.39 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.95 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | -0.43 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | -1.02 | +2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRDT | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | -0.30 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.38 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
CRDT vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDT drawdown since its inception was -9.80%, smaller than the maximum CDX drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDT and CDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDT | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -13.24% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -4.18% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -7.23% | +6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -4.33% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.76% | +0.64% |
Volatility
CRDT vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) at 1.61%. This indicates that CRDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDT | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 1.61% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 4.75% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.65% | 5.69% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 11.11% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 11.11% | -4.11% |
CRDT vs. CDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRDT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CDX's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRDT vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison
CRDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, less than CDX's 8.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | 8.35% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% |
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 6.20% | 7.04% | 7.29% | 2.59% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDT and CDX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDT has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to CDX (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDT dropped -9.80% vs CDX's -13.24%.
On 1-year performance, CRDT leads with 4.09% vs -1.71% for CDX. On fees, CDX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, CDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRDT has performed better with a 4.09% return vs -1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CRDT.
CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.35%, compared with 6.20% for CRDT.
CRDT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while CDX is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CRDT and 0.26% for CDX.
CRDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDT and CDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer