PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYLD vs. RINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYLD vs. RINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYLD achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than RINT's 8.39% return.


DYLD

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
10Y*

RINT

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.99%
YTD
8.39%
6M
11.05%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYLD vs. RINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DYLD and RINT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYLD vs. RINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYLD
DYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

RINT
RINT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYLD vs. RINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DYLDRINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.85

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

6.94

+4.48

DYLD vs. RINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the RINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYLD and RINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DYLDRINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.49

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.72

-1.46

Drawdowns

DYLD vs. RINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYLD drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than RINT's maximum drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLD and RINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYLDRINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-11.91%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.32%

-11.91%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.86%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-1.82%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

3.16%

-2.80%

Volatility

DYLD vs. RINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) is 0.60%, while Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that DYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYLDRINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

4.31%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

12.36%

-10.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

14.79%

-12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

14.64%

-10.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.39%

14.64%

-10.25%

DYLD vs. RINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RINT's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DYLD vs. RINT - Dividend Comparison

DYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than RINT's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DYLD
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF
4.33%4.20%4.58%3.43%1.54%1.02%
RINT
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
0.82%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYLD and RINT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RINT has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to DYLD (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYLD dropped -15.03% vs RINT's -11.91%.

On 1-year performance, RINT leads with 21.90% vs 4.12% for DYLD. On fees, RINT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RINT has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RINT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DYLD.

DYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.

DYLD is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while RINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: LeaderShares and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DYLD and 0.49% for RINT.

DYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYLD and RINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer