DYLD vs. JOJO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DYLD (LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF) and JOJO (ATAC Credit Rotation ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DYLD returned 4.51%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for JOJO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYLD charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for JOJO.

Performance

DYLD vs. JOJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYLD achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than JOJO's 2.56% return.

DYLD

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 4.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JOJO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 6M: 3.03%
• 1Y: 10.24%
• 3Y*: 6.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYLD vs. JOJO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DYLD LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF	1.11%	5.02%	3.69%	6.33%	-10.83%	0.05%
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	2.56%	10.52%	2.74%	7.61%	-22.01%	-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DYLD and JOJO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021	0.69

The correlation between DYLD and JOJO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DYLD vs. JOJO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYLD

DYLD Risk / Return Rank: 59
DYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
DYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

JOJO

JOJO Risk / Return Rank: 44
JOJO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
JOJO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
JOJO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
JOJO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
JOJO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYLD vs. JOJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DYLD	JOJO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.56	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	2.36	+0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.31	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	2.07	+1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.84	6.01	+5.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DYLD vs. JOJO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the JOJO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYLD and JOJO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DYLD	JOJO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	1.56	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	-0.05	+0.32

Drawdowns

DYLD vs. JOJO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYLD drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum JOJO drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLD and JOJO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYLD	JOJO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.03%	-28.43%	+13.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.32%	-4.93%	+3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.40%	-9.43%	+6.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.64%	+5.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-15.82%	+10.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	1.70%	-1.34%

Volatility

DYLD vs. JOJO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) is 0.60%, while ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that DYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JOJO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYLD	JOJO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.60%	1.22%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.99%	4.83%	-2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48%	6.61%	-4.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.39%	11.31%	-6.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.39%	11.31%	-6.92%

DYLD vs. JOJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than JOJO's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYLD vs. JOJO - Dividend Comparison

DYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than JOJO's 5.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DYLD LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF	4.33%	4.20%	4.58%	3.43%	1.54%	1.02%
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	5.11%	4.78%	4.88%	4.30%	3.63%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYLD and JOJO in my portfolio?

DYLD and JOJO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYLD or JOJO?

JOJO has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to DYLD (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYLD dropped -15.03% vs JOJO's -28.43%.

Which ETF is better, DYLD or JOJO?

On 3-year performance, JOJO leads with 6.68% vs 4.51% for DYLD. On fees, DYLD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYLD or JOJO?

Over the 3-year period, JOJO has performed better with a 6.68% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYLD or JOJO?

DYLD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYLD or JOJO?

JOJO has the higher dividend yield at 5.58%, compared with 4.33% for DYLD.

What is the main difference between DYLD and JOJO?

They also come from different issuers: LeaderShares and ATAC. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DYLD and 1.28% for JOJO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.