PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYLD vs. ABI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYLD vs. ABI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYLD achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than ABI's 3.08% return.


DYLD

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.07%
6M
0.81%
YTD
0.88%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*

ABI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.61%
YTD
3.08%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYLD vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DYLD and ABI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYLD vs. ABI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYLD
DYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ABI
ABI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ABI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ABI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYLD vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DYLDABIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

2.01

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

5.55

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

16.81

-7.52

DYLD vs. ABI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the ABI Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYLD and ABI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DYLD vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYLD drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than ABI's maximum drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLD and ABI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYLDABIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-0.95%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.32%

-0.95%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.05%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-0.17%

-4.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.31%

+0.05%

Volatility

DYLD vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison

LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) at 0.35%. This indicates that DYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYLDABIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.35%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

0.81%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41%

1.28%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.35%

1.26%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.35%

1.26%

+3.09%

DYLD vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ABI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DYLD vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison

DYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than ABI's 6.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ABI
VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF
6.21%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DYLD
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF
4.30%4.20%4.58%3.43%1.54%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYLD and ABI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DYLD has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to ABI (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYLD dropped -15.03% vs ABI's -0.95%.

On 1-year performance, ABI leads with 5.25% vs 3.33% for DYLD. On fees, ABI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ABI has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ABI has performed better with a 5.25% return vs 3.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DYLD.

ABI has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 4.30% for DYLD.

They also come from different issuers: LeaderShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DYLD and 0.65% for ABI.

ABI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYLD and ABI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer