DY vs. LRCX
DY (Dycom Industries, Inc.) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. DY operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, DY returned 15.82%/yr vs 43.64%/yr for LRCX. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DY vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DY achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 71.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DY has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 15.82%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 43.64% annualized return.
DY
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -14.76%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 1Y
- 49.20%
- 3Y*
- 58.45%
- 5Y*
- 42.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.01%
LRCX
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -25.11%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- YTD
- 71.50%
- 1Y
- 210.67%
- 3Y*
- 61.40%
- 5Y*
- 37.09%
- 10Y*
- 43.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $195.20M | $192.79M | $262.31M | |
| $3.65B | $3.82B | $3.92B |
DY vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DY Dycom Industries, Inc. | 18.69% | 94.13% | 51.24% | 22.96% | -0.17% | 24.15% | 60.17% | -12.75% | -51.50% | 38.78% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 71.50% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DY and LRCX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1990 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, DY and LRCX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
DY:
$12.04B
LRCX:
$366.44B
DY:
$10.48
LRCX:
$5.75
DY:
38.26
LRCX:
50.95
DY:
0.54
LRCX:
2.88
DY:
1.91
LRCX:
15.93
DY:
6.43
LRCX:
29.63
DY:
$6.25B
LRCX:
$23.23B
DY:
$1.23B
LRCX:
$11.73B
DY:
$1.07B
LRCX:
$8.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DY vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
DY
LRCX
DY vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.42 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 5.08 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 21.44 | -16.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DY vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DY drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DY and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -87.90% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.51% | -41.76% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.58% | -47.10% | +14.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.70% | -56.39% | +22.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.01% | -56.39% | -32.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.06% | -32.38% | +7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -28.13% | -17.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.06% | 9.87% | +0.19% |
Volatility
DY vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) is 19.81%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 27.34%. This indicates that DY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.81% | 27.34% | -7.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.94% | 52.39% | -9.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.41% | 63.10% | -12.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.18% | 48.97% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.32% | 46.20% | +7.12% |
Dividends
DY vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
DY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DY Dycom Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.35% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
DY vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dycom Industries, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DY vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
DY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 6.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
DY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.4%.
DY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 2.28B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DY and LRCX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (27.34%) compared to DY (19.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DY dropped -93.54% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DY and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer