DXUV vs. AIVL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) and AIVL (WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DXUV returned 24.78% vs 19.53% for AIVL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DXUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for AIVL.

Performance

DXUV vs. AIVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) and WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXUV achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than AIVL's 14.65% return.

DXUV

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 6M: 8.89%
• 1Y: 24.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIVL

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 14.65%
• 6M: 13.61%
• 1Y: 19.53%
• 3Y*: 15.11%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 9.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXUV vs. AIVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	10.49%	14.34%	5.03%
AIVL WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund	14.65%	9.72%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DXUV and AIVL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	0.84

The correlation between DXUV and AIVL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DXUV vs. AIVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DXUV	AIVL
Technology	26.7%	21.3%
Financial Services	15.6%	17.9%
Industrials	14.4%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	3.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	12.0%
Communication Services	7.7%	4.2%
Energy	6.4%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	7.8%
Basic Materials	3.7%	4.6%
Utilities	0.5%	8.9%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.5%

Return for Risk

DXUV vs. AIVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXUV

DXUV Risk / Return Rank: 67
DXUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
DXUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DXUV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DXUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DXUV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

AIVL

AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 58
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXUV vs. AIVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) and WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DXUV	AIVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.67	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.44	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.30	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	2.50	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.77	10.06	+1.71

DXUV vs. AIVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXUV Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the AIVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXUV and AIVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DXUV vs. AIVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXUV drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, smaller than the maximum AIVL drawdown of -62.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXUV and AIVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DXUV	AIVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.08%	-62.48%	+41.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	-7.85%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.48%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	0.00%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-7.89%	+4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	1.95%	+0.16%

Volatility

DXUV vs. AIVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) is 4.01%, while WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that DXUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DXUV	AIVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	4.23%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	9.36%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.95%	11.76%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.24%	14.76%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.24%	17.36%	-0.12%

DXUV vs. AIVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AIVL's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

DXUV vs. AIVL - Dividend Comparison

DXUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than AIVL's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIVL WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund	1.47%	1.61%	2.13%	2.43%	2.08%	2.75%	3.55%	3.25%	4.18%	3.16%	3.20%	3.41%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	1.00%	1.01%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DXUV and AIVL in my portfolio?

DXUV and AIVL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DXUV or AIVL?

AIVL has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DXUV (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXUV dropped -21.08% vs AIVL's -62.48%.

Which ETF is better, DXUV or AIVL?

On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 24.78% vs 19.53% for AIVL. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DXUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DXUV or AIVL?

Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 24.78% return vs 19.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DXUV or AIVL?

DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DXUV or AIVL?

AIVL has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.00% for DXUV.

What is the main difference between DXUV and AIVL?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DXUV and 0.38% for AIVL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.