PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXRLX vs. UGPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXRLX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund (DXRLX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXRLX achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -25.02% return. Over the past 10 years, DXRLX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 12.74%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -13.12% annualized return.


DXRLX

1D
1.58%
1M
8.33%
YTD
30.58%
6M
27.67%
1Y
70.57%
3Y*
23.98%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
12.74%

UGPIX

1D
4.53%
1M
-6.19%
YTD
-25.02%
6M
-28.64%
1Y
-11.24%
3Y*
-5.13%
5Y*
-34.94%
10Y*
-13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXRLX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXRLX
Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund
30.58%15.22%10.66%20.05%-40.24%26.84%20.98%46.08%-27.45%27.06%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
-25.02%36.28%-21.79%-11.49%-53.03%-73.86%76.47%40.07%-46.51%105.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DXRLX and UGPIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2000

0.23

The correlation between DXRLX and UGPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXRLX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXRLX
DXRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DXRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DXRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UGPIX
UGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
UGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXRLX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund (DXRLX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXRLXUGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.01

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

-0.19

+4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.74

-0.34

+14.08

DXRLX vs. UGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXRLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the UGPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXRLX and UGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXRLXUGPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

-0.19

+2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.09

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

-0.05

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.05

+0.10

Drawdowns

DXRLX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXRLX drawdown since its inception was -94.32%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXRLX and UGPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXRLXUGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.32%

-99.66%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.38%

-52.67%

+33.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.58%

-53.13%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.64%

-98.24%

+40.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.63%

-99.10%

+21.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-97.87%

+97.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-82.71%

+48.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

28.73%

-23.23%

Volatility

DXRLX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund (DXRLX) is 9.70%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that DXRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXRLXUGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

18.51%

-8.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.73%

36.57%

-12.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.42%

52.09%

-18.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.63%

390.11%

-348.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.20%

277.98%

-228.78%

DXRLX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXRLX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXRLX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison

DXRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than UGPIX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXRLX
Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund
1.59%1.23%0.66%0.00%2.27%0.84%0.71%3.76%7.60%0.00%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
8.06%6.05%2.91%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


DXRLX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGPIX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to DXRLX (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXRLX dropped -94.32% vs UGPIX's -99.66%.

DXRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXRLX and UGPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer