PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXRLX vs. UWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXRLX vs. UWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund (DXRLX) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXRLX achieves a 34.06% return, which is significantly lower than UWM's 41.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DXRLX having a 13.16% annualized return and UWM not far ahead at 13.66%.


DXRLX

1D
3.58%
1M
6.53%
YTD
34.06%
6M
27.13%
1Y
74.45%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
13.16%

UWM

1D
1.84%
1M
8.96%
YTD
41.43%
6M
32.94%
1Y
88.85%
3Y*
28.76%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXRLX vs. UWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXRLX
Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund
34.06%15.22%10.66%20.05%-40.24%26.84%20.98%46.08%-27.45%27.06%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
41.43%13.59%11.32%22.62%-43.69%23.91%16.57%48.62%-25.89%26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DXRLX and UWM is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2007

0.98

The correlation between DXRLX and UWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXRLX vs. UWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXRLX
DXRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DXRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DXRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXRLX vs. UWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund (DXRLX) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DXRLXUWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

4.01

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.43

13.68

-0.25

DXRLX vs. UWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXRLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the UWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXRLX and UWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DXRLX vs. UWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXRLX drawdown since its inception was -94.32%, which is greater than UWM's maximum drawdown of -88.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXRLX and UWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXRLXUWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.32%

-88.21%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.38%

-22.28%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.58%

-49.79%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.64%

-61.62%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.63%

-71.46%

-6.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-30.81%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

6.52%

-1.00%

Volatility

DXRLX vs. UWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund (DXRLX) is 11.90%, while ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a volatility of 12.87%. This indicates that DXRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXRLXUWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.90%

12.87%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.12%

28.31%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.44%

39.13%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.76%

45.16%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.26%

46.18%

+3.08%

DXRLX vs. UWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXRLX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UWM's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXRLX vs. UWM - Dividend Comparison

DXRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than UWM's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXRLX
Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund
1.55%1.23%0.66%0.00%2.27%0.84%0.71%3.76%7.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
0.73%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, DXRLX and UWM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UWM has higher volatility (12.87%) compared to DXRLX (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXRLX dropped -94.32% vs UWM's -88.21%.

UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXRLX and UWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer