DXRLX vs. UWM
DXRLX (Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund) and UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DXRLX returned 13.16%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for UWM. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DXRLX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UWM.
Performance
DXRLX vs. UWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXRLX achieves a 34.06% return, which is significantly lower than UWM's 41.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DXRLX having a 13.16% annualized return and UWM not far ahead at 13.66%.
DXRLX
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 34.06%
- 6M
- 27.13%
- 1Y
- 74.45%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
UWM
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 41.43%
- 6M
- 32.94%
- 1Y
- 88.85%
- 3Y*
- 28.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
DXRLX vs. UWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXRLX Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund | 34.06% | 15.22% | 10.66% | 20.05% | -40.24% | 26.84% | 20.98% | 46.08% | -27.45% | 27.06% |
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 41.43% | 13.59% | 11.32% | 22.62% | -43.69% | 23.91% | 16.57% | 48.62% | -25.89% | 26.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXRLX and UWM is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2007 | 0.98 |
The correlation between DXRLX and UWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXRLX vs. UWM — Risk / Return Rank
DXRLX
UWM
DXRLX vs. UWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund (DXRLX) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXRLX | UWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 4.01 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.43 | 13.68 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXRLX vs. UWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXRLX drawdown since its inception was -94.32%, which is greater than UWM's maximum drawdown of -88.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXRLX and UWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXRLX | UWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.32% | -88.21% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.38% | -22.28% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.58% | -49.79% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.64% | -61.62% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.63% | -71.46% | -6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -30.81% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 6.52% | -1.00% |
Volatility
DXRLX vs. UWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund (DXRLX) is 11.90%, while ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a volatility of 12.87%. This indicates that DXRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXRLX | UWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 12.87% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.12% | 28.31% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.44% | 39.13% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.76% | 45.16% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.26% | 46.18% | +3.08% |
DXRLX vs. UWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXRLX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UWM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXRLX vs. UWM - Dividend Comparison
DXRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than UWM's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXRLX Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bull 1.75X Fund | 1.55% | 1.23% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 0.84% | 0.71% | 3.76% | 7.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 0.73% | 1.05% | 1.16% | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.55% | 0.41% | 0.11% | 0.27% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, DXRLX and UWM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UWM has higher volatility (12.87%) compared to DXRLX (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXRLX dropped -94.32% vs UWM's -88.21%.
UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXRLX and UWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer