DXJS vs. QGRW
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW).
DXJS and QGRW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DXJS is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2013. QGRW is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 15, 2022. Both DXJS and QGRW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DXJS vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DXJS vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJS WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund | 17.27% | 37.08% | 20.70% | 38.96% | -2.16% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | -8.93% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 56.05% | -3.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXJS achieves a 17.27% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's -8.93% return.
DXJS
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 17.27%
- 6M
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 58.83%
- 3Y*
- 34.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.61%
QGRW
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -5.68%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DXJS vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXJS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DXJS vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
DXJS
QGRW
DXJS vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXJS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 0.91 | +1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.53 | 1.44 | +2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.20 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 1.40 | +3.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.87 | 5.31 | +14.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXJS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 0.91 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.29 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between DXJS and QGRW is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DXJS vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
DXJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than QGRW's 0.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJS WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund | 1.62% | 1.78% | 4.02% | 2.71% | 2.63% | 2.96% | 3.04% | 2.17% | 2.06% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 3.61% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DXJS vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXJS drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJS and QGRW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXJS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.30% | -24.40% | -14.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -15.44% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -11.77% | +6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -3.32% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 4.07% | -1.18% |
Volatility
DXJS vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) have volatilities of 7.98% and 7.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DXJS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 7.81% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 13.90% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.06% | 24.18% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 21.23% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 21.23% | -1.35% |