DXJ vs. GDX
DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXJ returned 18.72%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for GDX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DXJ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
DXJ vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXJ achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DXJ has outperformed GDX with an annualized return of 18.72%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.29% annualized return.
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 53.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.91%
- 5Y*
- 26.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
GDX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- 1Y
- 50.59%
- 3Y*
- 38.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
DXJ vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 18.74% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -6.69% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXJ and GDX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, DXJ and GDX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
DXJ vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXJ
GDX
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
DXJ
GDX
-
Financial Services
DXJ
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
DXJ
GDX
-
Technology
DXJ
GDX
-
Basic Materials
DXJ
GDX
Healthcare
DXJ
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
DXJ
GDX
-
Communication Services
DXJ
GDX
-
Energy
DXJ
GDX
-
Utilities
DXJ
GDX
-
Real Estate
DXJ
-
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXJ vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
DXJ
GDX
DXJ vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXJ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.21 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | 1.40 | +3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.93 | 3.87 | +15.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXJ vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJ and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXJ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.63% | -80.34% | +30.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -36.28% | +25.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -36.28% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -46.51% | +24.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.14% | -49.79% | +10.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -30.91% | +29.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -40.41% | +26.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 13.11% | -10.28% |
Volatility
DXJ vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) is 4.64%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that DXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXJ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 17.20% | -12.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 39.15% | -25.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.73% | 46.89% | -29.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 36.74% | -17.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 37.34% | -17.17% |
DXJ vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXJ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXJ vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than GDX's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.09% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXJ and GDX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to DXJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXJ dropped -49.63% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.72% vs 13.29% for GDX. On fees, DXJ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXJ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.79% for GDX.
DXJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while GDX is Gold. DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJ and 0.51% for GDX.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXJ and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer