PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DWX has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 7.29%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


DWX

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.07%
6M
6.49%
YTD
10.64%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
2.78%

VEA

1D
0.59%
1M
0.32%
6M
7.64%
YTD
14.51%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
10.06%
ALL TIME*
5.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$956.39K$1.20M$907.10K
$651.74M$763.09M$794.89M

DWX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
10.64%31.62%2.56%14.74%-12.99%10.56%-5.10%20.26%-11.11%18.91%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.51%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DWX and VEA is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2008

0.87

The correlation between DWX and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWX vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWX
VEA

Financial Services

17.3%
23.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.1%
5.3%

Communication Services

12.1%
3.2%

Industrials

10.6%
17.9%

Utilities

10.6%
3.1%

Real Estate

10.2%
2.5%

Energy

10.1%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.3%

Healthcare

4.4%
7.9%

Technology

2.9%
18.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
6.9%

Financial Services

DWX
17.3%
VEA
23.1%

Consumer Defensive

DWX
13.1%
VEA
5.3%

Communication Services

DWX
12.1%
VEA
3.2%

Industrials

DWX
10.6%
VEA
17.9%

Utilities

DWX
10.6%
VEA
3.1%

Real Estate

DWX
10.2%
VEA
2.5%

Energy

DWX
10.1%
VEA
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DWX
6.6%
VEA
7.3%

Healthcare

DWX
4.4%
VEA
7.9%

Technology

DWX
2.9%
VEA
18.4%

Basic Materials

DWX
2.1%
VEA
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWX
DWX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.63

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

9.84

-2.87

DWX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-60.68%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-11.63%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-13.45%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-29.71%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-35.73%

-0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-1.86%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-13.20%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.11%

-0.28%

Volatility

DWX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) is 2.85%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that DWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

5.40%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

15.35%

-6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

17.26%

-6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.25%

16.85%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

17.22%

-2.50%

DWX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

DWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than VEA's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
4.12%4.44%4.31%4.12%4.68%3.89%3.84%4.40%5.06%3.85%5.25%5.81%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.55%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWX and VEA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to DWX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWX dropped -66.86% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.06% vs 7.29% for DWX. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DWX.

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.55% for VEA.

DWX tracks S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DWX and 0.03% for VEA.

DWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer