PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWX vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWX vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWX achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 10.94% return. Over the past 10 years, DWX has underperformed RODM with an annualized return of 7.87%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.


DWX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
6.32%
6M
7.53%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
7.87%

RODM

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
10.94%
6M
11.39%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWX vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
6.32%31.62%2.56%14.74%-12.99%10.56%-5.10%20.26%-11.11%18.91%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
10.94%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DWX and RODM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.80

The correlation between DWX and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWX vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWX
RODM

Financial Services

16.5%
26.6%

Communication Services

12.9%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

12.8%
4.0%

Utilities

10.7%
4.8%

Industrials

10.5%
16.7%

Energy

10.3%
6.3%

Real Estate

10.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
6.0%

Healthcare

4.3%
9.0%

Technology

3.4%
10.5%

Basic Materials

2.2%
6.4%

Financial Services

DWX
16.5%
RODM
26.6%

Communication Services

DWX
12.9%
RODM
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

DWX
12.8%
RODM
4.0%

Utilities

DWX
10.7%
RODM
4.8%

Industrials

DWX
10.5%
RODM
16.7%

Energy

DWX
10.3%
RODM
6.3%

Real Estate

DWX
10.1%
RODM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DWX
6.3%
RODM
6.0%

Healthcare

DWX
4.3%
RODM
9.0%

Technology

DWX
3.4%
RODM
10.5%

Basic Materials

DWX
2.2%
RODM
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWX vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWX
DWX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWX vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWXRODMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.64

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

14.43

-8.58

DWX vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWX and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWX vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWX and RODM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWXRODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-35.98%

-30.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-7.10%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-10.58%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-28.85%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-35.98%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-1.47%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.10%

-6.36%

-7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.79%

+0.96%

Volatility

DWX vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) is 2.95%, while Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that DWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWXRODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

3.15%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

8.76%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

10.94%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.23%

13.45%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

15.19%

-0.17%

DWX vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWX vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

DWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than RODM's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
5.72%4.44%4.31%4.12%4.68%3.89%3.84%4.40%5.06%3.85%5.25%5.81%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.80%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWX and RODM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RODM has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to DWX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWX dropped -66.86% vs RODM's -35.98%.

On 10-year performance, RODM leads with 9.39% vs 7.87% for DWX. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.39% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DWX.

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 2.80% for RODM.

DWX tracks S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DWX and 0.29% for RODM.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWX and RODM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer