PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWX vs. NVOH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWX vs. NVOH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly higher than NVOH's -12.05% return.


DWX

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
6.54%
6M
9.07%
1Y
15.35%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
7.32%

NVOH

1D
-2.32%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
-12.05%
6M
-6.54%
1Y
-37.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWX vs. NVOH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DWX and NVOH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWX vs. NVOH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWX
DWX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NVOH
NVOH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NVOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVOH Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
NVOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVOH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWX vs. NVOH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) and Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWXNVOHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

-0.77

+2.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

-0.89

+2.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.87

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

-0.70

+2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.21

-1.03

+7.24

DWX vs. NVOH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the NVOH Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWX and NVOH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWXNVOHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

-0.77

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

-0.80

+0.92

Drawdowns

DWX vs. NVOH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWX drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than NVOH's maximum drawdown of -61.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWX and NVOH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWXNVOHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-61.60%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-53.00%

+44.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-53.72%

+49.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-38.26%

+24.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

35.98%

-33.36%

Volatility

DWX vs. NVOH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) is 3.08%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that DWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVOH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWXNVOHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

7.01%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

36.21%

-27.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

49.39%

-38.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.21%

49.09%

-36.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

49.09%

-34.00%

DWX vs. NVOH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NVOH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWX vs. NVOH - Dividend Comparison

DWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than NVOH's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
4.19%4.44%4.31%4.12%4.68%3.89%3.84%4.40%5.06%3.85%5.25%5.81%
NVOH
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF
3.90%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWX and NVOH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVOH has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to DWX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWX dropped -66.86% vs NVOH's -61.60%.

On 1-year performance, DWX leads with 15.35% vs -37.68% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DWX has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DWX has performed better with a 15.35% return vs -37.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DWX.

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 3.90% for NVOH.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DWX and 0.19% for NVOH.

DWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWX and NVOH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer