DWUS vs. UPAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) and UPAR (UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. DWUS is actively managed, while UPAR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DWUS returned 21.40%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for UPAR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWUS charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UPAR.

Performance

DWUS vs. UPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than UPAR's 9.98% return.

DWUS

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 10.17%
• YTD: 15.72%
• 6M: 15.19%
• 1Y: 24.82%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 12.00%
• 10Y*: —

UPAR

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 9.98%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 28.64%
• 3Y*: 10.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUS vs. UPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	15.72%	12.75%	20.26%	20.62%	-17.67%
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF	9.98%	23.87%	-2.26%	5.73%	-30.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and UPAR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2022	0.48

The correlation between DWUS and UPAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWUS vs. UPAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWUS	UPAR
Technology	45.9%	18.3%
Communication Services	13.4%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	6.3%
Healthcare	6.4%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	3.5%
Financial Services	5.8%	10.8%
Industrials	5.3%	12.7%
Energy	2.3%	17.8%
Utilities	1.6%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.4%	16.7%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.4%

Return for Risk

DWUS vs. UPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS

DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 45
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 47

UPAR

UPAR Risk / Return Rank: 57
UPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
UPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
UPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
UPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. UPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DWUS	UPAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.12	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.80	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.58	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	8.53	-0.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DWUS vs. UPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the UPAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUS and UPAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DWUS	UPAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	2.12	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	-0.02	+0.74

Drawdowns

DWUS vs. UPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum UPAR drawdown of -39.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and UPAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWUS	UPAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.47%	-39.00%	+8.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.98%	-11.13%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-18.73%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.99%	+3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.86%	-21.80%	+14.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	3.36%	-0.20%

Volatility

DWUS vs. UPAR - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) at 4.58%. This indicates that DWUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWUS	UPAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	4.58%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	11.44%	+1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	13.60%	+1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.82%	18.04%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	18.04%	+3.84%

DWUS vs. UPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than UPAR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWUS vs. UPAR - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than UPAR's 2.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF	0.03%	0.03%	0.18%	0.29%	0.89%	0.35%	0.08%
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF	2.63%	3.28%	3.32%	3.04%	4.73%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWUS and UPAR in my portfolio?

DWUS and UPAR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWUS or UPAR?

DWUS has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to UPAR (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs UPAR's -39.00%.

Which ETF is better, DWUS or UPAR?

On 3-year performance, DWUS leads with 21.40% vs 10.72% for UPAR. On fees, UPAR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, UPAR has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWUS or UPAR?

Over the 3-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWUS or UPAR?

UPAR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWUS or UPAR?

UPAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.

What is the main difference between DWUS and UPAR?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and RPAR. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 0.65% for UPAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.