PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWUS vs. GYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWUS vs. GYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than GYLD's 7.91% return.


DWUS

1D
0.53%
1M
10.17%
YTD
15.72%
6M
15.19%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*

GYLD

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
7.91%
6M
10.25%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
4.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUS vs. GYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
15.72%12.75%20.26%20.62%-17.89%20.21%35.99%-0.10%
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.91%19.85%3.83%10.36%-7.73%18.03%-11.17%-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and GYLD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019

0.32

The correlation between DWUS and GYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWUS vs. GYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWUS
GYLD

Technology

45.9%

-

Communication Services

13.4%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
2.5%

Healthcare

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
1.6%

Financial Services

5.8%
12.0%

Industrials

5.3%
4.3%

Energy

2.3%
30.0%

Utilities

1.6%
4.6%

Basic Materials

1.4%
7.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
34.8%

Technology

DWUS
45.9%
GYLD

-

Communication Services

DWUS
13.4%
GYLD
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DWUS
10.8%
GYLD
2.5%

Healthcare

DWUS
6.4%
GYLD

-

Consumer Defensive

DWUS
6.3%
GYLD
1.6%

Financial Services

DWUS
5.8%
GYLD
12.0%

Industrials

DWUS
5.3%
GYLD
4.3%

Energy

DWUS
2.3%
GYLD
30.0%

Utilities

DWUS
1.6%
GYLD
4.6%

Basic Materials

DWUS
1.4%
GYLD
7.5%

Real Estate

DWUS
0.9%
GYLD
34.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWUS vs. GYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS
DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GYLD
GYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. GYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWUSGYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.29

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

9.19

-1.31

DWUS vs. GYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the GYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUS and GYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWUSGYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.26

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.45

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.21

+0.51

Drawdowns

DWUS vs. GYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum GYLD drawdown of -55.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and GYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWUSGYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-55.03%

+24.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-4.86%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-8.37%

-11.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-20.24%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.71%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-14.41%

+7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

1.74%

+1.42%

Volatility

DWUS vs. GYLD - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) at 3.16%. This indicates that DWUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWUSGYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

3.16%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

9.39%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

12.78%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

13.79%

+5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

16.58%

+5.30%

DWUS vs. GYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GYLD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWUS vs. GYLD - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than GYLD's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
0.03%0.03%0.18%0.29%0.89%0.35%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.37%8.43%12.90%7.13%4.64%5.50%7.42%5.83%8.17%6.78%7.29%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWUS and GYLD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWUS has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to GYLD (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs GYLD's -55.03%.

On 5-year performance, DWUS leads with 12.00% vs 6.21% for GYLD. On fees, GYLD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GYLD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.

GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 0.75% for GYLD.

DWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWUS and GYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer