DWSH vs. YOLO
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while YOLO is a Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWSH returned -4.38%/yr vs -31.84%/yr for YOLO. Their -0.43 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for YOLO.
Performance
DWSH vs. YOLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a -11.96% return, which is significantly higher than YOLO's -23.78% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -8.92%
- YTD
- -11.96%
- 1Y
- -17.15%
- 3Y*
- -4.29%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.49%
YOLO
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -13.86%
- 6M
- -14.17%
- YTD
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- 12.91%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- -31.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $237.81K | $562.58K | $421.31K | |
| $67.34K | $67.94K | $99.32K |
DWSH vs. YOLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | -11.96% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -49.95% | -1.64% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | -23.78% | 36.36% | -17.81% | -15.10% | -72.21% | -20.48% | 47.17% | -51.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and YOLO is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019 | -0.43 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DWSH and YOLO has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.43 to -0.19, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
DWSH vs. YOLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWSH
YOLO
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Utilities
DWSH
YOLO
-
Energy
DWSH
YOLO
-
Real Estate
DWSH
YOLO
Basic Materials
DWSH
YOLO
-
Communication Services
DWSH
YOLO
-
Consumer Defensive
DWSH
YOLO
Financial Services
DWSH
YOLO
Industrials
DWSH
YOLO
-
Healthcare
DWSH
YOLO
Consumer Cyclical
DWSH
YOLO
Technology
DWSH
YOLO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. YOLO — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
YOLO
DWSH vs. YOLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWSH | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.11 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.31 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.88 | 0.50 | -2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. YOLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, smaller than the maximum YOLO drawdown of -94.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and YOLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.80% | -94.68% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.08% | -41.57% | +21.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.61% | -66.45% | +32.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | -91.67% | +54.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.64% | -91.08% | +7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.95% | -69.38% | +5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.24% | 25.89% | -16.65% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. YOLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is 12.14%, while AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a volatility of 13.95%. This indicates that DWSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YOLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.14% | 13.95% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.18% | 39.02% | -20.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.70% | 75.19% | -52.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 53.99% | -27.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 51.22% | -19.95% |
DWSH vs. YOLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than YOLO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. YOLO - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, while YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 7.17% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.57% | 1.17% | 0.55% | 3.93% | 2.03% | 4.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and YOLO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YOLO has higher volatility (13.95%) compared to DWSH (12.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -83.80% vs YOLO's -94.68%.
On 5-year performance, DWSH leads with -4.38% vs -31.84% for YOLO. On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 12.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -4.38% return vs -31.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 7.17%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.
DWSH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YOLO is Cannabis. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.75% for YOLO.
YOLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and YOLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer