DWSH vs. SH
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. DWSH is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWSH returned -4.38%/yr vs -8.25%/yr for SH. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.
Performance
DWSH vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a -11.96% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -7.97% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -8.92%
- YTD
- -11.96%
- 1Y
- -17.15%
- 3Y*
- -4.29%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.49%
SH
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- -7.97%
- 1Y
- -14.42%
- 3Y*
- -12.05%
- 5Y*
- -8.25%
- 10Y*
- -12.49%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $237.81K | $562.58K | $421.31K | |
| $269.15M | $242.02M | $299.42M |
DWSH vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | -11.96% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -49.95% | -25.27% | 22.37% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -7.97% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 10.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and SH is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2018 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DWSH and SH has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DWSH vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWSH
SH
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Utilities
DWSH
SH
-
Energy
DWSH
SH
-
Real Estate
DWSH
SH
-
Basic Materials
DWSH
SH
-
Communication Services
DWSH
SH
-
Consumer Defensive
DWSH
SH
-
Financial Services
DWSH
SH
Industrials
DWSH
SH
-
Healthcare
DWSH
SH
-
Consumer Cyclical
DWSH
SH
-
Technology
DWSH
SH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
SH
DWSH vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWSH | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.82 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.90 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.88 | -1.66 | -0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.80% | -94.66% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.08% | -16.06% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.61% | -38.82% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | -44.53% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.64% | -94.62% | +10.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.95% | -67.93% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.24% | 9.08% | +0.16% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a higher volatility of 12.14% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 3.78%. This indicates that DWSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.14% | 3.78% | +8.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.18% | 10.16% | +8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.70% | 12.78% | +9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 16.98% | +9.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.27% | 18.03% | +13.24% |
DWSH vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than SH's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 7.17% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.25% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and SH have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWSH has higher volatility (12.14%) compared to SH (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -83.80% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 5-year performance, DWSH leads with -4.38% vs -8.25% for SH. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -4.38% return vs -8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 7.17%, compared with 4.25% for SH.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.89% for SH.
DWSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer