DWSH vs. PLTZ
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PLTZ.
Performance
DWSH vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 4.28% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTZ
- 1D
- 13.03%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 0.85% | -10.35% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 4.28% | -64.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and PLTZ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
PLTZ
DWSH vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWSH | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWSH | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.62 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and PLTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -70.28% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.25% | -62.87% | -18.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -52.02% | -11.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | — | — |
Volatility
DWSH vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 101.99% | -80.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 101.99% | -76.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 101.99% | -70.77% |
DWSH vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, while PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.26% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 1.29% for PLTZ.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and PLTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer