PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWSH vs. AADR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWSH vs. AADR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than AADR's -1.56% return.


DWSH

1D
2.36%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.07%
1Y
-10.40%
3Y*
-4.14%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*

AADR

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.01%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
0.12%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWSH vs. AADR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
0.85%-2.57%5.98%-22.04%17.45%-25.74%-49.95%-25.27%22.28%
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
-1.56%25.63%24.58%18.67%-22.93%6.48%13.13%35.35%-24.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DWSH and AADR is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2018

-0.47

The correlation between DWSH and AADR shifts across timeframes, from -0.50 (5 years) to -0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWSH vs. AADR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWSH
AADR

Utilities

-

5.4%

Basic Materials

-0.8%
16.9%

Energy

-1.1%
7.6%

Communication Services

-4.5%
7.4%

Real Estate

-5.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

-7.7%
2.2%

Financial Services

-8.9%
14.6%

Healthcare

-12.0%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-12.6%
3.9%

Industrials

-13.5%
14.6%

Technology

-25.6%
9.5%

Utilities

DWSH

-

AADR
5.4%

Basic Materials

DWSH
-0.8%
AADR
16.9%

Energy

DWSH
-1.1%
AADR
7.6%

Communication Services

DWSH
-4.5%
AADR
7.4%

Real Estate

DWSH
-5.9%
AADR

-

Consumer Defensive

DWSH
-7.7%
AADR
2.2%

Financial Services

DWSH
-8.9%
AADR
14.6%

Healthcare

DWSH
-12.0%
AADR
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DWSH
-12.6%
AADR
3.9%

Industrials

DWSH
-13.5%
AADR
14.6%

Technology

DWSH
-25.6%
AADR
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWSH vs. AADR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWSH
DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AADR
AADR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWSH vs. AADR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWSHAADRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.50

0.45

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.55

0.76

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.10

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

0.50

-1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.88

1.40

-2.28

DWSH vs. AADR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the AADR Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWSH and AADR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWSHAADRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

0.45

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.29

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

0.43

-0.86

Drawdowns

DWSH vs. AADR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, which is greater than AADR's maximum drawdown of -45.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and AADR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWSHAADRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.73%

-45.01%

-37.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-19.30%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.23%

-20.61%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.87%

-34.80%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.25%

-12.54%

-68.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.61%

-9.40%

-54.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.82%

6.82%

+5.00%

Volatility

DWSH vs. AADR - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) have volatilities of 6.08% and 6.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWSHAADRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

6.34%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

17.55%

-3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.19%

21.33%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.93%

21.68%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.22%

22.20%

+9.02%

DWSH vs. AADR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than AADR's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWSH vs. AADR - Dividend Comparison

DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than AADR's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
0.54%0.49%1.33%0.74%3.65%0.92%0.11%0.58%0.75%0.74%0.58%0.81%
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
6.26%6.31%6.17%10.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWSH and AADR have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AADR has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to DWSH (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -82.73% vs AADR's -45.01%.

On 5-year performance, AADR leads with 6.23% vs -1.61% for DWSH. On fees, AADR is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AADR has performed better with a 6.23% return vs -1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AADR is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.54% for AADR.

DWSH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AADR is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 1.10% for AADR.

AADR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWSH and AADR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer