DWMF vs. MCSE
DWMF (WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund) and MCSE (Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DWMF returned 14.16%/yr vs -0.89%/yr for MCSE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWMF charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.
Performance
DWMF vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWMF achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.
DWMF
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 11.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
MCSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- -0.25%
- 3Y*
- -0.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWMF vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund | 5.04% | 24.42% | 10.22% | 10.78% | 4.82% |
MCSE Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF | 1.12% | 7.79% | -9.46% | 14.86% | 10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWMF and MCSE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DWMF and MCSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DWMF vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWMF
MCSE
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
DWMF
MCSE
Industrials
DWMF
MCSE
Consumer Defensive
DWMF
MCSE
Communication Services
DWMF
MCSE
Healthcare
DWMF
MCSE
Utilities
DWMF
MCSE
-
Real Estate
DWMF
MCSE
-
Consumer Cyclical
DWMF
MCSE
Technology
DWMF
MCSE
Basic Materials
DWMF
MCSE
Energy
DWMF
MCSE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWMF vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank
DWMF
MCSE
DWMF vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWMF | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | -0.03 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | -0.06 | +3.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWMF vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWMF drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, which is greater than MCSE's maximum drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWMF and MCSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWMF | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.72% | -26.36% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -10.42% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.74% | -26.36% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -10.51% | +6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -8.77% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 4.30% | -1.02% |
Volatility
DWMF vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that DWMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWMF | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 0.00% | +5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 3.62% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 11.19% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 19.23% | -7.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.14% | 19.23% | -5.09% |
DWMF vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWMF has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWMF vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison
DWMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund | 3.12% | 2.80% | 3.50% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.54% | 2.06% | 2.77% | 1.15% |
MCSE Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF | 3.74% | 3.78% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWMF and MCSE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWMF has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWMF dropped -29.72% vs MCSE's -26.36%.
On 3-year performance, DWMF leads with 14.16% vs -0.89% for MCSE. On fees, DWMF is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DWMF has performed better with a 14.16% return vs -0.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DWMF is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.
MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 3.12% for DWMF.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Martin Currie. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DWMF and 0.59% for MCSE.
DWMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWMF and MCSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer