PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWMF vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWMF vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWMF achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 16.66% return.


DWMF

1D
0.02%
1M
0.05%
6M
2.42%
YTD
5.83%
1Y
12.12%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.38%

DHS

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.58%
6M
9.76%
YTD
16.66%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
8.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.32M$3.61M$2.98M
$46.55K$45.08K$66.89K

DWMF vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
5.83%24.42%10.22%10.78%-7.31%11.24%-1.18%16.10%-7.26%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
16.66%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DWMF and DHS is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018

0.60

The correlation between DWMF and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWMF vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWMF
DHS

Industrials

27.4%
4.5%

Financial Services

26.4%
23.2%

Technology

13.6%
7.4%

Basic Materials

9.8%
1.1%

Utilities

6.0%
8.9%

Energy

4.3%
8.2%

Healthcare

4.2%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
5.4%

Real Estate

1.7%
3.0%

Communication Services

1.4%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
14.2%

Industrials

DWMF
27.4%
DHS
4.5%

Financial Services

DWMF
26.4%
DHS
23.2%

Technology

DWMF
13.6%
DHS
7.4%

Basic Materials

DWMF
9.8%
DHS
1.1%

Utilities

DWMF
6.0%
DHS
8.9%

Energy

DWMF
4.3%
DHS
8.2%

Healthcare

DWMF
4.2%
DHS
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DWMF
4.0%
DHS
5.4%

Real Estate

DWMF
1.7%
DHS
3.0%

Communication Services

DWMF
1.4%
DHS
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

DWMF
1.2%
DHS
14.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWMF vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWMF
DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWMF vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWMFDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

3.97

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.64

14.58

-10.95

DWMF vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWMF and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWMF vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWMF drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWMF and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMFDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.72%

-67.25%

+37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-6.30%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.74%

-11.87%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-15.28%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-2.23%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-9.48%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

1.71%

+1.69%

Volatility

DWMF vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 3.88%. This indicates that DWMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMFDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

3.88%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

7.92%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

10.43%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

13.91%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

16.09%

-1.93%

DWMF vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DWMF and DHS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

DWMF vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

DWMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than DHS's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.19%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
3.10%2.80%3.50%4.01%3.41%3.54%2.06%2.77%1.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWMF and DHS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWMF has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to DHS (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWMF dropped -29.72% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 5-year performance, DHS leads with 12.26% vs 8.75% for DWMF. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DHS has performed better with a 12.26% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWMF and DHS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 3.10% for DWMF.

DWMF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWMF and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer