PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWMF vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWMF vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWMF achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 10.63% return.


DWMF

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
2.60%
6M
3.53%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*

DHS

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
10.63%
6M
11.97%
1Y
21.74%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWMF vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
2.60%24.42%10.22%10.78%-7.31%11.24%-1.18%16.10%-7.30%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
10.63%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DWMF and DHS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018

0.62

The correlation between DWMF and DHS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWMF vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWMF
DHS

Financial Services

20.0%
22.3%

Industrials

18.9%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
18.7%

Communication Services

9.5%
9.3%

Utilities

9.2%
9.0%

Healthcare

9.0%
14.5%

Real Estate

6.7%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
5.0%

Technology

4.0%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.2%

Energy

2.0%
9.4%

Financial Services

DWMF
20.0%
DHS
22.3%

Industrials

DWMF
18.9%
DHS
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

DWMF
11.5%
DHS
18.7%

Communication Services

DWMF
9.5%
DHS
9.3%

Utilities

DWMF
9.2%
DHS
9.0%

Healthcare

DWMF
9.0%
DHS
14.5%

Real Estate

DWMF
6.7%
DHS
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DWMF
5.5%
DHS
5.0%

Technology

DWMF
4.0%
DHS
3.7%

Basic Materials

DWMF
3.7%
DHS
1.2%

Energy

DWMF
2.0%
DHS
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWMF vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWMF
DWMF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DWMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWMF Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DWMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWMF vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWMFDHSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

2.19

-1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

3.27

-2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

3.47

-2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

12.82

-9.82

DWMF vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWMF and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWMFDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.19

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.78

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.41

+0.10

Drawdowns

DWMF vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWMF drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWMF and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMFDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.72%

-67.25%

+37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-6.30%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.74%

-11.87%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.00%

-15.28%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-1.94%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-9.55%

+5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

1.70%

+1.24%

Volatility

DWMF vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 2.88%. This indicates that DWMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMFDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

2.88%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

7.31%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

9.98%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

13.88%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

16.08%

-1.97%

DWMF vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DWMF and DHS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.


Dividends

DWMF vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

DWMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than DHS's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.33%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
DWMF
WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund
2.90%2.80%3.50%4.01%3.41%3.54%2.06%2.77%1.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWMF and DHS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWMF has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to DHS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWMF dropped -29.72% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 5-year performance, DHS leads with 10.82% vs 8.42% for DWMF. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DHS has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWMF and DHS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.90% for DWMF.

DWMF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWMF and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer