PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWM vs. EFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWM vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWM achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than EFV's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, DWM has underperformed EFV with an annualized return of 8.50%, while EFV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.


DWM

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.23%
YTD
7.43%
6M
10.04%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
8.50%

EFV

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.13%
6M
12.94%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWM vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
7.43%34.83%4.15%16.63%-9.04%10.76%-2.33%18.98%-13.53%24.08%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
9.13%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DWM and EFV is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.96

The correlation between DWM and EFV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWM vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWM
EFV

Industrials

21.1%
10.2%

Financial Services

20.7%
36.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
4.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
7.2%

Technology

8.2%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
8.3%

Communication Services

5.5%
4.4%

Utilities

5.5%
5.9%

Basic Materials

5.3%
7.5%

Energy

4.0%
7.0%

Real Estate

3.2%
2.5%

Industrials

DWM
21.1%
EFV
10.2%

Financial Services

DWM
20.7%
EFV
36.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DWM
10.4%
EFV
4.8%

Healthcare

DWM
8.6%
EFV
7.2%

Technology

DWM
8.2%
EFV
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

DWM
7.5%
EFV
8.3%

Communication Services

DWM
5.5%
EFV
4.4%

Utilities

DWM
5.5%
EFV
5.9%

Basic Materials

DWM
5.3%
EFV
7.5%

Energy

DWM
4.0%
EFV
7.0%

Real Estate

DWM
3.2%
EFV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWM vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWM
DWM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWM vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWMEFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.57

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

9.57

-2.49

DWM vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWM and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWMEFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.97

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.76

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.55

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.27

0.00

Drawdowns

DWM vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWM drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, roughly equal to the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWM and EFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMEFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.10%

-63.94%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-10.90%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-13.72%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-25.84%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.82%

-43.16%

+5.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-2.51%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-14.83%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.91%

+0.05%

Volatility

DWM vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMEFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.52%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

11.56%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

14.21%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

15.96%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

17.86%

-1.27%

DWM vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EFV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWM vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

DWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than EFV's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
2.76%3.06%3.86%4.15%4.36%3.64%2.74%3.46%3.86%2.99%3.43%3.55%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.81%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DWM and EFV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFV has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to DWM (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWM dropped -62.10% vs EFV's -63.94%.

On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 9.75% vs 8.50% for DWM. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 9.75% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DWM.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.76% for DWM.

DWM tracks WisdomTree International Equity Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DWM and 0.39% for EFV.

EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWM and EFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer