PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWM vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWM vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWM achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, DWM has underperformed DHS with an annualized return of 8.50%, while DHS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.


DWM

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.23%
YTD
7.43%
6M
10.04%
1Y
20.93%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
8.50%

DHS

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.38%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWM vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
7.43%34.83%4.15%16.63%-9.04%10.76%-2.33%18.98%-13.53%24.08%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
9.88%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DWM and DHS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between DWM and DHS has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DWM vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWM
DHS

Industrials

21.1%
4.1%

Financial Services

20.7%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
5.0%

Healthcare

8.6%
14.5%

Technology

8.2%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
18.7%

Communication Services

5.5%
9.3%

Utilities

5.5%
9.0%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.2%

Energy

4.0%
9.4%

Real Estate

3.2%
2.8%

Industrials

DWM
21.1%
DHS
4.1%

Financial Services

DWM
20.7%
DHS
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DWM
10.4%
DHS
5.0%

Healthcare

DWM
8.6%
DHS
14.5%

Technology

DWM
8.2%
DHS
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

DWM
7.5%
DHS
18.7%

Communication Services

DWM
5.5%
DHS
9.3%

Utilities

DWM
5.5%
DHS
9.0%

Basic Materials

DWM
5.3%
DHS
1.2%

Energy

DWM
4.0%
DHS
9.4%

Real Estate

DWM
3.2%
DHS
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWM vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWM
DWM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWM vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWMDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.28

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

12.04

-4.96

DWM vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWM and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWMDHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.06

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.77

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.59

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.41

-0.14

Drawdowns

DWM vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWM drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWM and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWMDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.10%

-67.25%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-6.30%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-11.87%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-15.28%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.82%

-37.35%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-2.60%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-9.55%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.71%

+1.25%

Volatility

DWM vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Equity Fund (DWM) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 2.88%. This indicates that DWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWMDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

2.88%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

7.32%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

10.01%

+4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

13.89%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

16.08%

+0.51%

DWM vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWM vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

DWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than DHS's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.35%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
DWM
WisdomTree International Equity Fund
2.76%3.06%3.86%4.15%4.36%3.64%2.74%3.46%3.86%2.99%3.43%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWM and DHS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWM has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to DHS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWM dropped -62.10% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 10-year performance, DHS leads with 9.47% vs 8.50% for DWM. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DHS has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DWM.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.76% for DWM.

DWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. DWM tracks WisdomTree International Equity Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DWM and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWM and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer