DWAS vs. XMMO
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - DWAS tracks the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index while XMMO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DWAS returned 13.88%/yr vs 20.13%/yr for XMMO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
DWAS vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 24.87% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 22.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 13.88%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.13% annualized return.
DWAS
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 24.87%
- 6M
- 21.56%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
XMMO
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 6M
- 20.25%
- 1Y
- 35.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 20.13%
DWAS vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.87% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 32.32% | 31.39% | -10.68% | 20.84% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.90% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and XMMO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DWAS and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWAS vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAS
XMMO
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
DWAS
XMMO
Technology
DWAS
XMMO
Industrials
DWAS
XMMO
Financial Services
DWAS
XMMO
Energy
DWAS
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
DWAS
XMMO
Basic Materials
DWAS
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
DWAS
XMMO
Real Estate
DWAS
XMMO
Communication Services
DWAS
XMMO
Utilities
DWAS
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
XMMO
DWAS vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWAS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 4.31 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.54 | 17.07 | -2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -55.37% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -8.34% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -24.93% | -8.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -27.91% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | -36.74% | -9.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -2.42% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -9.43% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.10% | +1.00% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) have volatilities of 8.88% and 8.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 8.50% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.12% | 16.79% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.99% | 19.94% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.86% | 21.65% | +4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.69% | 22.33% | +4.36% |
DWAS vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.57% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAS and XMMO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWAS has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to XMMO (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 20.13% vs 13.88% for DWAS. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 20.13% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.
DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.35% for XMMO.
DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer