PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. VFMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 23.55% return.


DWAS

1D
0.37%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.58%
6M
22.17%
1Y
41.87%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
13.13%

VFMO

1D
1.51%
1M
5.48%
YTD
23.55%
6M
24.95%
1Y
44.08%
3Y*
27.89%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAS vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
19.58%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-13.43%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
23.55%17.39%26.14%16.25%-12.84%19.16%31.36%28.22%-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and VFMO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.93

The correlation between DWAS and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAS vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
VFMO

Healthcare

28.2%
22.9%

Technology

18.6%
17.5%

Industrials

16.9%
24.7%

Financial Services

13.0%
6.5%

Energy

7.7%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
8.7%

Basic Materials

4.0%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.1%

Communication Services

1.1%
3.4%

Utilities

0.3%
0.2%

Healthcare

DWAS
28.2%
VFMO
22.9%

Technology

DWAS
18.6%
VFMO
17.5%

Industrials

DWAS
16.9%
VFMO
24.7%

Financial Services

DWAS
13.0%
VFMO
6.5%

Energy

DWAS
7.7%
VFMO
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
6.0%
VFMO
8.7%

Basic Materials

DWAS
4.0%
VFMO
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
3.1%
VFMO
2.5%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.1%
VFMO
0.1%

Communication Services

DWAS
1.1%
VFMO
3.4%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
VFMO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAS vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWASVFMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.09

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

2.74

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

4.07

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.89

15.40

-1.51

DWAS vs. VFMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the VFMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and VFMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWASVFMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.09

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.65

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.66

-0.17

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and VFMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASVFMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-36.77%

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-10.98%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-24.40%

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-25.80%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

0.00%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-7.77%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.90%

+0.16%

Volatility

DWAS vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) at 6.20%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASVFMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

6.20%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.03%

16.48%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.80%

21.20%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

21.70%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.61%

23.57%

+3.04%

DWAS vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison

DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than VFMO's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.01%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.63%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DWAS and VFMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DWAS has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to VFMO (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs VFMO's -36.77%.

On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 13.98% vs 6.47% for DWAS. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.13% for VFMO.

VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and VFMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer