DWAS vs. VFMO
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. DWAS is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWAS returned 6.47%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for VFMO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
DWAS vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 23.55% return.
DWAS
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
VFMO
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 23.55%
- 6M
- 24.95%
- 1Y
- 44.08%
- 3Y*
- 27.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAS vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 19.58% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 32.32% | 31.39% | -13.43% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.55% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and VFMO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DWAS and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWAS vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAS
VFMO
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
DWAS
VFMO
Technology
DWAS
VFMO
Industrials
DWAS
VFMO
Financial Services
DWAS
VFMO
Energy
DWAS
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
DWAS
VFMO
Basic Materials
DWAS
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
DWAS
VFMO
Real Estate
DWAS
VFMO
Communication Services
DWAS
VFMO
Utilities
DWAS
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
VFMO
DWAS vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAS | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.09 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.74 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 4.07 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 15.40 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAS | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.09 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.65 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.66 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -36.77% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -10.98% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -24.40% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -25.80% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | 0.00% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -7.77% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.90% | +0.16% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) at 6.20%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 6.20% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 16.48% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 21.20% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 21.70% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 23.57% | +3.04% |
DWAS vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than VFMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DWAS and VFMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DWAS has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to VFMO (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 13.98% vs 6.47% for DWAS. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.13% for VFMO.
VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer