PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. SPVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has outperformed SPVM with an annualized return of 13.13%, while SPVM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.97% annualized return.


DWAS

1D
0.37%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.58%
6M
22.17%
1Y
41.87%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
13.13%

SPVM

1D
0.92%
1M
3.08%
YTD
9.05%
6M
11.85%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAS vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
19.58%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
9.05%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and SPVM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012

0.64

The correlation between DWAS and SPVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DWAS vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
SPVM

Healthcare

28.2%
6.3%

Technology

18.6%
5.3%

Industrials

16.9%
4.4%

Financial Services

13.0%
37.0%

Energy

7.7%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
6.3%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Communication Services

1.1%
6.6%

Utilities

0.3%
14.2%

Healthcare

DWAS
28.2%
SPVM
6.3%

Technology

DWAS
18.6%
SPVM
5.3%

Industrials

DWAS
16.9%
SPVM
4.4%

Financial Services

DWAS
13.0%
SPVM
37.0%

Energy

DWAS
7.7%
SPVM
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
6.0%
SPVM
6.3%

Basic Materials

DWAS
4.0%
SPVM
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
3.1%
SPVM
4.9%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.1%
SPVM
1.9%

Communication Services

DWAS
1.1%
SPVM
6.6%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
SPVM
14.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAS vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWASSPVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.58

-0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

3.68

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

4.53

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.89

17.27

-3.38

DWAS vs. SPVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the SPVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and SPVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWASSPVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.58

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.62

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.61

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.63

-0.14

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and SPVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASSPVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-45.35%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-6.57%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-18.66%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-19.48%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-45.35%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

0.00%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-4.99%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.72%

+1.34%

Volatility

DWAS vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 2.81%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASSPVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

2.81%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.03%

7.49%

+9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.80%

11.61%

+11.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

16.77%

+8.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.61%

19.58%

+7.03%

DWAS vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison

DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPVM's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.01%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.90%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAS and SPVM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAS has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to SPVM (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs SPVM's -45.35%.

On 10-year performance, DWAS leads with 13.13% vs 11.97% for SPVM. On fees, SPVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DWAS has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.

DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and SPVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer