PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 5.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 13.13%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.


DWAS

1D
0.37%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.58%
6M
22.17%
1Y
41.87%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
13.13%

SPHD

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
5.32%
6M
5.99%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAS vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
19.58%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
5.32%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and SPHD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between DWAS and SPHD has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DWAS vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
SPHD

Healthcare

28.2%
5.1%

Technology

18.6%
1.5%

Industrials

16.9%
0.0%

Financial Services

13.0%
15.6%

Energy

7.7%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
17.8%

Real Estate

1.1%
20.1%

Communication Services

1.1%
8.6%

Utilities

0.3%
13.7%

Healthcare

DWAS
28.2%
SPHD
5.1%

Technology

DWAS
18.6%
SPHD
1.5%

Industrials

DWAS
16.9%
SPHD
0.0%

Financial Services

DWAS
13.0%
SPHD
15.6%

Energy

DWAS
7.7%
SPHD
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
6.0%
SPHD
3.4%

Basic Materials

DWAS
4.0%
SPHD

-

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
3.1%
SPHD
17.8%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.1%
SPHD
20.1%

Communication Services

DWAS
1.1%
SPHD
8.6%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
SPHD
13.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAS vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWASSPHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

0.84

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

1.30

+1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

1.25

+2.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.89

3.16

+10.73

DWAS vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWASSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

0.84

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.41

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.41

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.58

-0.10

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-41.39%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-7.33%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-13.29%

-20.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-19.50%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-41.39%

-4.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-4.53%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-4.70%

-5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.91%

+0.15%

Volatility

DWAS vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.97%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

2.97%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.03%

7.54%

+9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.80%

11.00%

+11.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

14.16%

+11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.61%

17.64%

+8.97%

DWAS vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPHD's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.01%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.58%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAS and SPHD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAS has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to SPHD (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, DWAS leads with 13.13% vs 7.18% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DWAS has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.

DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while SPHD is S&P 500. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while SPHD tracks S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.30% for SPHD.

DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer