PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 44.44% return.


DWAS

1D
2.36%
1M
-4.52%
6M
13.09%
YTD
18.89%
1Y
38.93%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
12.36%
ALL TIME*
11.83%

QQQA

1D
1.29%
1M
-5.50%
6M
31.12%
YTD
44.44%
1Y
62.87%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.30M$3.37M$2.26M
$2.42M$3.28M$3.82M

DWAS vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
18.89%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%9.35%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
44.44%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and QQQA is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.69

The correlation between DWAS and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAS vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
QQQA

Healthcare

28.5%
5.6%

Technology

20.9%
74.4%

Industrials

16.6%

-

Financial Services

14.1%

-

Energy

5.9%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
3.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Communication Services

0.9%
11.0%

Utilities

0.3%

-

Healthcare

DWAS
28.5%
QQQA
5.6%

Technology

DWAS
20.9%
QQQA
74.4%

Industrials

DWAS
16.6%
QQQA

-

Financial Services

DWAS
14.1%
QQQA

-

Energy

DWAS
5.9%
QQQA
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
5.7%
QQQA
3.1%

Basic Materials

DWAS
3.2%
QQQA

-

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
2.9%
QQQA

-

Real Estate

DWAS
1.1%
QQQA

-

Communication Services

DWAS
0.9%
QQQA
11.0%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
QQQA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWAS vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWASQQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.82

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

9.70

-0.06

DWAS vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than QQQA's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-38.44%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-22.41%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-30.84%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-38.44%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.64%

-17.45%

+7.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-15.52%

+5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

6.50%

-2.45%

Volatility

DWAS vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) is 9.74%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that DWAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

10.99%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

29.73%

-9.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.73%

33.66%

-7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.95%

27.46%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

27.08%

-0.23%

DWAS vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.00%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.03%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAS and QQQA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to DWAS (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 10.11% vs 7.65% for DWAS. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DWAS has been the lower-risk option at 9.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 7.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

QQQA has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer