DVYA vs. YCS
DVYA (iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - DVYA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DVYA returned 6.57%/yr vs 13.21%/yr for YCS. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DVYA charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
DVYA vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVYA achieves a 17.53% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DVYA has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 6.57%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.
DVYA
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 17.53%
- 1Y
- 33.61%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.46%
YCS
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- 6M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 22.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $231.55K | $344.93K | $287.92K | |
| $2.37M | $2.29M | $1.56M |
DVYA vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 17.53% | 30.22% | 6.05% | 13.75% | -2.17% | 3.41% | -9.61% | 14.70% | -14.87% | 16.99% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 4.11% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVYA and YCS is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DVYA and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.32, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVYA vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
DVYA
YCS
DVYA vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVYA | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.26 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 2.53 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 9.53 | +2.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVYA vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVYA drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVYA and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVYA | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.61% | -49.56% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -8.48% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -23.05% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | -27.32% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.61% | -27.32% | -18.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -8.48% | +6.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -19.75% | +9.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.24% | +0.67% |
Volatility
DVYA vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) is 3.43%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that DVYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVYA | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 5.88% | -2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 11.84% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.33% | 16.43% | -3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 21.21% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 18.61% | -1.20% |
DVYA vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVYA vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVYA iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | 4.41% | 4.71% | 5.97% | 6.48% | 7.29% | 5.81% | 3.66% | 5.52% | 6.24% | 4.74% | 4.79% | 5.33% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVYA and YCS have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to DVYA (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVYA dropped -45.61% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.21% vs 6.57% for DVYA. On fees, DVYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DVYA has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.21% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DVYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
DVYA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVYA and 1.00% for YCS.
DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVYA and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer