PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVYA vs. FAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVYA vs. FAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVYA achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than FAX's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DVYA has outperformed FAX with an annualized return of 7.30%, while FAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.90% annualized return.


DVYA

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.51%
YTD
13.35%
6M
13.63%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
7.30%

FAX

1D
-1.57%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
0.63%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVYA vs. FAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
13.35%30.22%6.05%13.75%-2.17%3.41%-9.61%14.70%-14.87%16.99%
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
-0.83%18.23%2.31%16.53%-22.83%-7.20%14.08%19.48%-12.72%14.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DVYA and FAX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVYA vs. FAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVYA
DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FAX
FAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVYA vs. FAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVYAFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.05

0.35

+2.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.06

0.56

+3.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.07

+0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

0.39

+4.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.66

0.88

+15.78

DVYA vs. FAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVYA Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the FAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVYA and FAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVYAFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

0.35

+2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

-0.00

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.18

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.17

+0.14

Drawdowns

DVYA vs. FAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVYA drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, smaller than the maximum FAX drawdown of -63.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVYA and FAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVYAFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.61%

-63.96%

+18.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-11.14%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-13.17%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-40.49%

+15.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.61%

-40.57%

-5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-7.99%

+4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-17.85%

+7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

4.88%

-2.50%

Volatility

DVYA vs. FAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) is 3.94%, while abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that DVYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVYAFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

5.36%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

10.00%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

12.35%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

15.94%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

16.51%

+1.04%

DVYA vs. FAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FAX's 3.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVYA vs. FAX - Dividend Comparison

DVYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than FAX's 13.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
4.33%4.71%5.97%6.48%7.29%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.79%5.33%
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
13.74%12.91%13.45%12.18%12.55%8.64%7.42%8.29%10.85%8.61%9.07%9.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVYA and FAX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to DVYA (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVYA dropped -45.61% vs FAX's -63.96%.

DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVYA and FAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer