DVXV vs. XHS
DVXV (WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF) and XHS (SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - DVXV tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index while XHS tracks the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVXV charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHS.
Performance
DVXV vs. XHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXV achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than XHS's 17.69% return.
DVXV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -2.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHS
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 10.57%
- YTD
- 17.69%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- 1Y
- 28.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
DVXV vs. XHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | -1.06% | 21.27% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 17.69% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXV and XHS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXV vs. XHS — Risk / Return Rank
DVXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XHS
DVXV vs. XHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVXV | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXV vs. XHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXV drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum XHS drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXV and XHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXV | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -39.32% | +24.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | 0.00% | -5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -10.16% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.32% | — |
Volatility
DVXV vs. XHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXV | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.41% | 18.01% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 21.15% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 22.40% | -0.99% |
DVXV vs. XHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXV has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than XHS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXV vs. XHS - Dividend Comparison
DVXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.21% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXV and XHS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXV.
XHS has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.00% for DVXV.
DVXV tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index, while XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXV and 0.35% for XHS.
Find the right allocation for DVXV and XHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer