DVXV vs. SBIO
DVXV (WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF) and SBIO (ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - DVXV tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index while SBIO tracks the S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVXV charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SBIO.
Performance
DVXV vs. SBIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXV achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than SBIO's 23.86% return.
DVXV
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIO
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- 19.11%
- 6M
- 23.86%
- YTD
- 23.86%
- 1Y
- 91.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
DVXV vs. SBIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | 4.43% | 21.27% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 23.86% | 56.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXV and SBIO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXV vs. SBIO — Risk / Return Rank
DVXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SBIO
DVXV vs. SBIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVXV | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXV vs. SBIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXV drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum SBIO drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXV and SBIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXV | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -63.06% | +48.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -7.98% | +6.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -28.22% | +23.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.59% | — |
Volatility
DVXV vs. SBIO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXV | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 30.61% | -8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 33.88% | -12.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 33.16% | -11.54% |
DVXV vs. SBIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXV has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXV vs. SBIO - Dividend Comparison
Neither DVXV nor SBIO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.55% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 2.79% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXV and SBIO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBIO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBIO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXV.
DVXV and SBIO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DVXV tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLV Index, while SBIO tracks S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXV and 0.50% for SBIO.
Find the right allocation for DVXV and SBIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer