DVXK vs. VGT
DVXK (WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - DVXK tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DVXK charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
DVXK vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXK achieves a 30.18% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 22.32% return.
DVXK
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 30.18%
- 6M
- 26.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 22.32%
- 6M
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 43.06%
- 3Y*
- 29.77%
- 5Y*
- 19.33%
- 10Y*
- 25.39%
DVXK vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF | 30.18% | 16.30% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.32% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXK and VGT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXK vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
DVXK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGT
DVXK vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF (DVXK) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVXK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXK vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXK drawdown since its inception was -24.08%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXK and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.08% | -54.63% | +30.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | -8.46% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -7.95% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.39% | — |
Volatility
DVXK vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.30% | 22.73% | +10.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.30% | 25.55% | +7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.30% | 24.76% | +8.54% |
DVXK vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXK has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXK vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
DVXK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXK WEBs Technology XLK Defined Volatility ETF | 2.55% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, DVXK and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXK.
DVXK has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
DVXK tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLK Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXK and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for DVXK and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer