DVXF vs. KBWP
DVXF (WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF) and KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - DVXF tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index while KBWP tracks the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVXF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWP.
Performance
DVXF vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXF achieves a -14.23% return, which is significantly lower than KBWP's -8.80% return.
DVXF
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- -14.23%
- 6M
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBWP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -8.80%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- -7.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
DVXF vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF | -14.23% | 3.87% |
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | -8.80% | 7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXF and KBWP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXF vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank
DVXF
KBWP
DVXF vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXF | KBWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.69 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
DVXF vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXF drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, smaller than the maximum KBWP drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXF and KBWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXF | KBWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.68% | -39.76% | +13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.95% | -9.56% | -9.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -4.37% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.72% | — |
Volatility
DVXF vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXF | KBWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.54% | 16.20% | +11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 18.53% | +9.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 20.70% | +6.84% |
DVXF vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWP's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXF vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison
DVXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 2.03% | 1.58% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.99% | 3.02% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.11% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXF and KBWP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXF.
KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for DVXF.
DVXF tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index, while KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXF and 0.35% for KBWP.
Find the right allocation for DVXF and KBWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer