DVXF vs. FNCL
DVXF (WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF) and FNCL (Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - DVXF tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index while FNCL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DVXF charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FNCL.
Performance
DVXF vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXF achieves a -14.23% return, which is significantly lower than FNCL's -6.43% return.
DVXF
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- -14.23%
- 6M
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNCL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -3.99%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
DVXF vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF | -14.23% | 3.87% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | -6.43% | 3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXF and FNCL is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXF vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank
DVXF
FNCL
DVXF vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF (DVXF) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVXF | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.53 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
DVXF vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXF drawdown since its inception was -26.68%, smaller than the maximum FNCL drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXF and FNCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXF | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.68% | -44.38% | +17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.95% | -9.28% | -9.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -6.90% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.56% | — |
Volatility
DVXF vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXF | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.54% | 14.76% | +12.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 19.26% | +8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 22.34% | +5.20% |
DVXF vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXF vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison
DVXF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXF WEBs Financial XLF Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.70% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, DVXF and FNCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXF.
FNCL has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.00% for DVXF.
DVXF tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLF Index, while FNCL tracks MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXF and 0.08% for FNCL.
Find the right allocation for DVXF and FNCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer