DVXB vs. SLX
DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) are both Materials funds - DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index while SLX tracks the NYSE Arca Steel Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVXB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for SLX.
Performance
DVXB vs. SLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXB achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than SLX's 19.94% return.
DVXB
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLX
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- 19.94%
- 6M
- 19.56%
- 1Y
- 60.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
DVXB vs. SLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 16.95% | -6.27% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 19.94% | 17.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXB and SLX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXB vs. SLX — Risk / Return Rank
DVXB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SLX
DVXB vs. SLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVXB | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXB vs. SLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum SLX drawdown of -82.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and SLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXB | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -82.14% | +62.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.39% | -10.38% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.10% | -38.63% | +31.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.84% | — |
Volatility
DVXB vs. SLX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXB | SLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.80% | 25.19% | +5.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.80% | 27.84% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.80% | 30.90% | -0.10% |
DVXB vs. SLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SLX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXB vs. SLX - Dividend Comparison
DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.29% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXB and SLX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLX is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLX is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
SLX has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXB and 0.56% for SLX.
Find the right allocation for DVXB and SLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer