DVXB vs. MXI
DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index while MXI tracks the S&P Global Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVXB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for MXI.
Performance
DVXB vs. MXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXB achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than MXI's 10.80% return.
DVXB
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MXI
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
DVXB vs. MXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 16.59% | -6.27% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 10.80% | 9.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXB and MXI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXB vs. MXI — Risk / Return Rank
DVXB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MXI
DVXB vs. MXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVXB | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXB vs. MXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum MXI drawdown of -68.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and MXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXB | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -68.44% | +48.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -8.12% | -3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -18.01% | +10.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.54% | — |
Volatility
DVXB vs. MXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXB | MXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.61% | 20.81% | +9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 19.88% | +10.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 20.38% | +10.23% |
DVXB vs. MXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than MXI's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXB vs. MXI - Dividend Comparison
DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.73% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXB and MXI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXB and 0.46% for MXI.
Find the right allocation for DVXB and MXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer