DVXB vs. IYM

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and IYM (iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index while IYM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVXB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYM.

Performance

DVXB vs. IYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DVXB having a 16.59% return and IYM slightly lower at 16.38%.

DVXB

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -3.31%
• 6M: 3.92%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IYM

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -4.91%
• 6M: 8.64%
• YTD: 16.38%
• 1Y: 24.67%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: 10.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVXB vs. IYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF	16.59%	-6.27%
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF	16.38%	5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DVXB and IYM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

DVXB vs. IYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVXB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IYM

IYM Risk / Return Rank: 43
IYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
IYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IYM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IYM Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVXB vs. IYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVXB	IYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.22	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.37	—

Drawdowns

DVXB vs. IYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum IYM drawdown of -67.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and IYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVXB	IYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.77%	-67.78%	+48.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.61%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.66%	-5.71%	-5.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.29%	-11.42%	+4.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DVXB	IYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.61%	19.85%	+10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.61%	20.51%	+10.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.61%	21.69%	+8.92%

DVXB vs. IYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVXB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IYM's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVXB vs. IYM - Dividend Comparison

DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF	1.31%	1.51%	1.65%	1.77%	2.14%	1.48%	1.39%	2.08%	1.68%	1.43%	1.47%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVXB and IYM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, DVXB and IYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DVXB or IYM?

On fees, IYM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVXB or IYM?

IYM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVXB or IYM?

IYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.

What is the main difference between DVXB and IYM?

DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while IYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXB and 0.42% for IYM.