DVXB vs. CUT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and CUT (Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF) are both Materials funds - DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index while CUT tracks the Beacon Global Timber Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DVXB returned 20.35% vs 3.71% for CUT. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DVXB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CUT.

Performance

DVXB vs. CUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVXB achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly higher than CUT's 2.55% return.

DVXB

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.08%
• 6M: -0.84%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 1Y: 20.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.74%

CUT

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 5.48%
• 6M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 1Y: 3.71%
• 3Y*: 0.91%
• 5Y*: -2.27%
• 10Y*: 4.61%
• ALL TIME*: 3.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF	$44.52K	$39.34K	$61.87K
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF	$1.05K	$1.06K	$4.38K

DVXB vs. CUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF	15.12%	-6.27%
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF	2.55%	-3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DVXB and CUT is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.74

The correlation between DVXB and CUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DVXB vs. CUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVXB

DVXB Risk / Return Rank: 27
DVXB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
DVXB Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
DVXB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
DVXB Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
DVXB Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CUT

CUT Risk / Return Rank: 15
CUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
CUT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
CUT Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVXB vs. CUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVXB	CUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	0.21	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	0.45	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.05	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	0.20	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	0.38	+1.70

DVXB vs. CUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVXB Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the CUT Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVXB and CUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVXB vs. CUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum CUT drawdown of -70.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and CUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVXB	CUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.77%	-70.03%	+50.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.77%	-19.62%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.78%	-16.37%	+3.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.54%	-15.31%	+7.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.63%	10.44%	-1.81%

Volatility

DVXB vs. CUT - Volatility Comparison

WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF (CUT) at 6.63%. This indicates that DVXB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVXB	CUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.95%	6.63%	+2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.87%	15.11%	+7.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.49%	19.10%	+11.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.60%	18.68%	+11.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.60%	20.10%	+10.50%

DVXB vs. CUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVXB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CUT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVXB vs. CUT - Dividend Comparison

DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CUT Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF	2.40%	2.46%	3.05%	2.44%	2.58%	1.57%	1.65%	2.67%	3.43%	1.57%	2.08%	1.52%
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVXB and CUT in my portfolio?

DVXB and CUT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVXB or CUT?

DVXB has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to CUT (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVXB dropped -19.77% vs CUT's -70.03%.

Which ETF is better, DVXB or CUT?

On 1-year performance, DVXB leads with 20.35% vs 3.71% for CUT. On fees, CUT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CUT has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVXB or CUT?

Over the 1-year period, DVXB has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVXB or CUT?

CUT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVXB or CUT?

CUT has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.

What is the main difference between DVXB and CUT?

DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while CUT tracks Beacon Global Timber Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXB and 0.55% for CUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DVXB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.