DVQQ vs. RPG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DVQQ (WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DVQQ tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility Triple Qs Index while RPG tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DVQQ returned 46.21% vs 47.03% for RPG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVQQ charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.

Performance

DVQQ vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVQQ achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 36.60% return.

DVQQ

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 17.26%
• 6M: 15.36%
• 1Y: 46.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RPG

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 10.57%
• YTD: 36.60%
• 6M: 33.46%
• 1Y: 47.03%
• 3Y*: 29.74%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: 15.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVQQ vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DVQQ WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF	17.26%	18.03%	-7.84%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	36.60%	13.41%	-4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DVQQ and RPG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024	0.81

The correlation between DVQQ and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DVQQ vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVQQ

DVQQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
DVQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DVQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
DVQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
DVQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
DVQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 73
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVQQ vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVQQ	RPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.19	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.91	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	4.27	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	16.15	-7.82

DVQQ vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVQQ and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVQQ vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVQQ drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVQQ and RPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVQQ	RPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.28%	-53.27%	+27.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.89%	-11.08%	-6.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.76%	0.00%	-3.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-8.83%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	2.92%	+2.64%

Volatility

DVQQ vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF (DVQQ) is 9.22%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that DVQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVQQ	RPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.22%	9.89%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.81%	18.39%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.05%	21.61%	+2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.92%	23.77%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.92%	22.88%	+2.04%

DVQQ vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVQQ has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVQQ vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

DVQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than RPG's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVQQ WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.19%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVQQ and RPG in my portfolio?

DVQQ and RPG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVQQ or RPG?

RPG has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to DVQQ (9.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVQQ dropped -25.28% vs RPG's -53.27%.

Which ETF is better, DVQQ or RPG?

On 1-year performance, RPG leads with 47.03% vs 46.21% for DVQQ. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DVQQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVQQ or RPG?

Over the 1-year period, RPG has performed better with a 47.03% return vs 46.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVQQ or RPG?

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DVQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVQQ or RPG?

RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.03% for DVQQ.

What is the main difference between DVQQ and RPG?

DVQQ tracks Syntax Defined Volatility Triple Qs Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for DVQQ and 0.35% for RPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.