PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVOL vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVOL vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) and State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVOL achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 3.09% return.


DVOL

1D
0.16%
1M
2.33%
6M
5.83%
YTD
8.15%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.44%

MMTM

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.70%
6M
1.21%
YTD
3.09%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.93%
ALL TIME*
14.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$232.56K$170.69K$310.57K
$399.23K$398.88K$392.43K

DVOL vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
8.15%4.30%24.84%5.39%-16.10%30.08%11.15%26.10%-10.21%
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
3.09%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-14.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DVOL and MMTM is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between DVOL and MMTM has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DVOL vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DVOL
MMTM

Financial Services

19.1%
8.2%

Industrials

17.4%
11.0%

Energy

13.7%
4.5%

Real Estate

12.4%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
2.7%

Basic Materials

6.1%
1.8%

Technology

4.7%
42.6%

Healthcare

3.3%
6.6%

Utilities

3.0%
2.0%

Communication Services

3.0%
11.4%

Financial Services

DVOL
19.1%
MMTM
8.2%

Industrials

DVOL
17.4%
MMTM
11.0%

Energy

DVOL
13.7%
MMTM
4.5%

Real Estate

DVOL
12.4%
MMTM
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DVOL
9.5%
MMTM
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

DVOL
8.0%
MMTM
2.7%

Basic Materials

DVOL
6.1%
MMTM
1.8%

Technology

DVOL
4.7%
MMTM
42.6%

Healthcare

DVOL
3.3%
MMTM
6.6%

Utilities

DVOL
3.0%
MMTM
2.0%

Communication Services

DVOL
3.0%
MMTM
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVOL vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVOL
DVOL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVOL vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) and State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVOLMMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.10

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

3.77

+0.05

DVOL vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVOL and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVOL vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVOL drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVOL and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVOLMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.26%

-33.85%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-9.89%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-22.08%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

-23.72%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-6.95%

+5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-4.20%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.89%

-0.10%

Volatility

DVOL vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) is 3.31%, while State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that DVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVOLMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

5.26%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

11.87%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

15.49%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

18.34%

-3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

18.71%

-1.11%

DVOL vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVOL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVOL vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

DVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than MMTM's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
0.75%0.86%0.67%1.28%1.37%0.47%0.60%1.79%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.90%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVOL and MMTM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMTM has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to DVOL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVOL dropped -38.26% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 5-year performance, MMTM leads with 11.41% vs 6.77% for DVOL. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.

MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.75% for DVOL.

DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DVOL and 0.12% for MMTM.

DVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVOL and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer