DVGR vs. ROE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DVGR (DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVGR is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by DAC, while ROE is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Astoria. Both are actively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DVGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.

Performance

DVGR vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVGR achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.35% return.

DVGR

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.76%
• 6M: 6.96%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

ROE

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 16.21%
• YTD: 20.35%
• 1Y: 33.36%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF	$154.80K	$105.54K	$58.19K
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	$1.20M	$1.18M	$910.23K

DVGR vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF	9.35%	-0.69%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	20.35%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DVGR and ROE is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

DVGR vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DVGR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 88
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DVGR vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVGR	ROE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.14	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.82	—

Drawdowns

DVGR vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVGR drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVGR and ROE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVGR	ROE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-19.10%	+10.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.66%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-1.30%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-2.54%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DVGR	ROE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.83%	15.07%	-2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.83%	15.87%	-3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.83%	15.87%	-3.04%

DVGR vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVGR vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

DVGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than ROE's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF	0.60%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	1.01%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVGR and ROE in my portfolio?

DVGR and ROE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DVGR or ROE?

On fees, ROE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVGR or ROE?

ROE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DVGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVGR or ROE?

ROE has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.60% for DVGR.

What is the main difference between DVGR and ROE?

DVGR is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ROE is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: DAC and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DVGR and 0.49% for ROE.