DVGR vs. ROE
DVGR (DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.
Performance
DVGR vs. ROE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVGR achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.98% return.
DVGR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 21.56%
- 1Y
- 37.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DVGR vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF | 8.13% | -0.65% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 20.98% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVGR and ROE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVGR vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank
DVGR
ROE
DVGR vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVGR | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 1.39 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
DVGR vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVGR drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVGR and ROE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVGR | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -19.10% | +10.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.04% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -2.59% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
DVGR vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVGR | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 13.94% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 15.78% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 15.78% | -2.39% |
DVGR vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVGR vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison
DVGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than ROE's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DVGR DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 0.94% | 0.97% | 1.18% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVGR and ROE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DVGR.
ROE has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.49% for DVGR.
They also come from different issuers: Dividend Assets Capital and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DVGR and 0.49% for ROE.
Find the right allocation for DVGR and ROE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer