DVAL vs. SPLV
DVAL (BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BrandywineGLOBAL, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. DVAL is actively managed, while SPLV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DVAL returned 12.66%/yr vs 7.54%/yr for SPLV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.
Performance
DVAL vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVAL achieves a 6.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 1.32% return.
DVAL
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
DVAL vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 6.15% | 8.74% | 12.84% | 8.73% | 1.78% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1.32% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVAL and SPLV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DVAL and SPLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
DVAL vs. SPLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DVAL
SPLV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DVAL
SPLV
Industrials
DVAL
SPLV
Technology
DVAL
SPLV
Consumer Cyclical
DVAL
SPLV
Communication Services
DVAL
SPLV
Healthcare
DVAL
SPLV
Consumer Defensive
DVAL
SPLV
Energy
DVAL
SPLV
Utilities
DVAL
SPLV
Basic Materials
DVAL
SPLV
Real Estate
DVAL
-
SPLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVAL vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
DVAL
SPLV
DVAL vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVAL | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.01 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | -0.00 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | -0.01 | +6.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVAL | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | -0.00 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.68 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
DVAL vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVAL drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVAL and SPLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVAL | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -36.26% | +18.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -7.41% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | -9.64% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -6.91% | +5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -3.55% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 3.05% | -1.12% |
Volatility
DVAL vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) is 2.73%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that DVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVAL | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.97% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.62% | 6.78% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.59% | 9.78% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 12.45% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 15.36% | -1.12% |
DVAL vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVAL vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
DVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than SPLV's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 2.82% | 1.16% | 13.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.22% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVAL and SPLV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to DVAL (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVAL dropped -18.11% vs SPLV's -36.26%.
On 3-year performance, DVAL leads with 12.66% vs 7.54% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DVAL has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVAL.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.88% for DVAL.
DVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPLV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVAL and 0.25% for SPLV.
DVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVAL and SPLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer