DVAL vs. FTA
DVAL (BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DVAL is actively managed, while FTA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DVAL returned 12.37%/yr vs 15.29%/yr for FTA. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTA.
Performance
DVAL vs. FTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVAL achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than FTA's 18.18% return.
DVAL
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 18.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.11%
FTA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 31.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $286.13K | $154.34K | $233.85K | |
| $3.06M | $3.30M | $2.95M |
DVAL vs. FTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 13.26% | 8.74% | 12.84% | 8.73% | 1.56% |
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 18.18% | 14.94% | 10.13% | 10.08% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVAL and FTA is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DVAL and FTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
DVAL vs. FTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DVAL
FTA
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DVAL
FTA
Industrials
DVAL
FTA
Technology
DVAL
FTA
Consumer Cyclical
DVAL
FTA
Healthcare
DVAL
FTA
Communication Services
DVAL
FTA
Energy
DVAL
FTA
Consumer Defensive
DVAL
FTA
Utilities
DVAL
FTA
Basic Materials
DVAL
FTA
Real Estate
DVAL
-
FTA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVAL vs. FTA — Risk / Return Rank
DVAL
FTA
DVAL vs. FTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) and First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVAL | FTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 5.93 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | 20.26 | -10.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVAL vs. FTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVAL drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum FTA drawdown of -62.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVAL and FTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVAL | FTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -62.45% | +44.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -5.13% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | -18.73% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.56% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -8.97% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.50% | +0.34% |
Volatility
DVAL vs. FTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (DVAL) is 3.03%, while First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that DVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVAL | FTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 3.93% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 8.04% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.61% | 11.61% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 16.23% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 19.85% | -5.74% |
DVAL vs. FTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FTA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVAL vs. FTA - Dividend Comparison
DVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than FTA's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVAL BrandywineGLOBAL Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.77% | 2.00% | 2.82% | 1.16% | 13.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.61% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.54% | 2.03% | 1.88% | 2.28% | 1.53% | 1.56% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVAL and FTA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTA has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to DVAL (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVAL dropped -18.11% vs FTA's -62.45%.
On 3-year performance, FTA leads with 15.29% vs 12.37% for DVAL. On fees, DVAL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTA has performed better with a 15.29% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DVAL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.
DVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.61% for FTA.
They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DVAL and 0.60% for FTA.
FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVAL and FTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer