PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DUSG vs. RFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DUSG vs. RFG

Last updated Aug 5, 2026
Documentation

DUSG (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF) and RFG (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. DUSG is actively managed, while RFG is passively managed. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DUSG charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RFG.

Performance

DUSG vs. RFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF (DUSG) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

DUSG

1D
1.93%
1M
3.13%
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

RFG

1D
2.39%
1M
-1.08%
6M
10.93%
YTD
18.03%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
9.88%
ALL TIME*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

DUSG

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF
$522.27K$298.89K$124.88K

RFG

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
$419.71K$376.80K$417.91K

DUSG vs. RFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
DUSG
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF		7.14%
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF		1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DUSG and RFG is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026

0.65

DUSG vs. RFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DUSG
RFG

Industrials

25.2%
31.6%

Technology

18.2%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

16.6%
6.7%

Healthcare

12.4%
19.3%

Financial Services

9.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

6.1%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
2.4%

Energy

3.5%
4.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
1.6%

Utilities

0.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.9%

Industrials

DUSG
25.2%
RFG
31.6%

Technology

DUSG
18.2%
RFG
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DUSG
16.6%
RFG
6.7%

Healthcare

DUSG
12.4%
RFG
19.3%

Financial Services

DUSG
9.0%
RFG
3.4%

Basic Materials

DUSG
6.1%
RFG
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

DUSG
5.4%
RFG
2.4%

Energy

DUSG
3.5%
RFG
4.0%

Communication Services

DUSG
2.9%
RFG
1.6%

Utilities

DUSG
0.4%
RFG
2.2%

Real Estate

DUSG
0.3%
RFG
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF

Often compared with DUSG:
DUSG vs. SSCPDUSG vs. VBKDUSG vs. VTWGDUSG vs. IJTDUSG vs. FSEGDUSG vs. VIOGDUSG vs. JPSE
Often compared with RFG:
RFG vs. RFVRFG vs. IVOGRFG vs. SPMDRFG vs. FRTYRFG vs. FDISRFG vs. VOTRFG vs. IMCG

Return for Risk

DUSG vs. RFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
DUSG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RFG
RFG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DUSG vs. RFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF (DUSG) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DUSGRFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.16

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

1.73

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.21

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.21

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

7.41

—

DUSG vs. RFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUSG vs. RFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUSG drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, smaller than the maximum RFG drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSG and RFG.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DUSGRFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-51.93%

+47.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-10.41%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-26.71%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-35.16%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-42.92%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.21%

+4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-8.93%

+7.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.10%

—

Volatility

DUSG vs. RFG - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DUSGRFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.58%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

16.39%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.82%

19.88%

-5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

23.03%

-8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.82%

23.12%

-8.30%

DUSG vs. RFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUSG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than RFG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUSG vs. RFG - Dividend Comparison

DUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, which matches RFG's 0.14% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUSG
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap Growth ETF		0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF		0.14%0.43%0.38%0.99%0.78%0.05%0.27%0.64%0.76%0.66%0.35%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

DUSG and RFG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DUSG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DUSG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFG.

DUSG and RFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.14%.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DUSG and 0.35% for RFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUSG and RFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer