DUSB vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
DUSB and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DUSB is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DUSB or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between DUSB and BND is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DUSB vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DUSB:
10.22
BND:
0.79
DUSB:
21.89
BND:
1.15
DUSB:
5.12
BND:
1.14
DUSB:
46.78
BND:
0.30
DUSB:
293.88
BND:
1.97
DUSB:
0.02%
BND:
2.06%
DUSB:
0.54%
BND:
5.18%
DUSB:
-0.12%
BND:
-18.84%
DUSB:
-0.03%
BND:
-8.61%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSB achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.81% return.
DUSB
0.60%
0.42%
2.56%
5.46%
N/A
N/A
BND
0.81%
0.76%
-1.26%
4.11%
-0.68%
1.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DUSB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DUSB vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DUSB
BND
DUSB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DUSB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
DUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than BND's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSB Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.68% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
DUSB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSB and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DUSB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) is 0.15%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that DUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.