DUSA vs. BUFH
DUSA (Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUSA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Davis Advisers, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUSA charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
DUSA vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSA achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
DUSA
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 26.21%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUSA vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUSA Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF | 7.71% | 13.72% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUSA and BUFH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUSA vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
DUSA
BUFH
DUSA vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF (DUSA) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUSA | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUSA | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 2.91 | -2.26 |
Drawdowns
DUSA vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSA drawdown since its inception was -36.71%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSA and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUSA | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.71% | -1.53% | -35.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -0.05% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -0.18% | -6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | — | — |
Volatility
DUSA vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUSA | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.84% | 2.37% | +10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 2.37% | +16.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 2.37% | +17.48% |
DUSA vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSA has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUSA vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
DUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DUSA Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF | 0.89% | 0.96% | 0.85% | 3.38% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 0.51% | 1.12% | 2.77% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUSA and BUFH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUSA is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUSA is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
DUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
DUSA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for DUSA and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for DUSA and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer