PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DURPX vs. BKTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DURPX vs. BKTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURPX achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than BKTSX's 10.89% return.


DURPX

1D
-0.50%
1M
5.00%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.88%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*

BKTSX

1D
-0.75%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.89%
6M
10.63%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DURPX vs. BKTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
8.72%12.81%20.49%21.85%-11.82%25.27%19.29%33.11%-5.11%17.77%
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
10.89%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DURPX and BKTSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2017

0.94

The correlation between DURPX and BKTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DURPX vs. BKTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DURPX
DURPX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DURPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DURPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DURPX vs. BKTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DURPXBKTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.14

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

14.42

-4.90

DURPX vs. BKTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the BKTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURPX and BKTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DURPXBKTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.29

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.74

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.82

+0.03

Drawdowns

DURPX vs. BKTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURPX drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum BKTSX drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURPX and BKTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DURPXBKTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-34.97%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-8.87%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-19.29%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-24.98%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.75%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-4.53%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.93%

+0.11%

Volatility

DURPX vs. BKTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) is 2.43%, while iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that DURPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DURPXBKTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

3.05%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

9.14%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

12.18%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

17.36%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

18.41%

-0.83%

DURPX vs. BKTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BKTSX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DURPX vs. BKTSX - Dividend Comparison

DURPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than BKTSX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.05%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
0.97%1.05%1.20%1.49%3.65%4.12%1.34%1.36%1.69%0.77%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DURPX and BKTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKTSX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to DURPX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURPX dropped -31.02% vs BKTSX's -34.97%.

BKTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DURPX and BKTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer